These are the evaluations done by our group (Group 2) to some of the other groups'presentations. There are two groups' evaluation and ourselves' missing; we gave them to the teacher but did not keep a copy... Maybe the three missing were the best ones!
Group 4: 60%
- Contents: Complete although with some misunderstandings.
- Communication skills:
- 2 of them just read. The 3rd addresses to the class and explains her part.
- They don’t seem comfortable with English what doesn’t mean that they don’t master the contents.
- Tech quality:
- Too much text in the presentation
- They use a video to sum up.
Group 1: 80%
- Contents: Complete but with the doubt if it was fully understood by all the members of the group, as it was seen when Miguel asked final questions.
- Communication skills: Good performance while explaining concepts although no examples were given.
- Tech quality:
- Use of prezi è research of different ways of showing info.
- The design as an schematic starting point to be developed with their own explanations.
- The use of videos and images to complete the information given.
Group 3: 80%
- Contents:
- Complete and reinforced by the videos included in the presentation.
- Examples were not given.
- Communication skills:
- The group was heterogeneous; half of them just read instead of explaining (maybe because of the insecurity shown in their knowledge about the topic).
- Tech quality:
- A power point very dynamic.
- Videos were well chosen and placed in the presentation.
